Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Page Header Logo

Articles

No. 1(1) (2011): Demons in the Social Sciences

Pitfalls of Sociological Mantra. On Peter L. Berger’s “Disinvitation to Sociology”

  • Stanisław Burdziej
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51196/srz.1.14
Published
1. 11. 2011

Abstract

In his well-known paper published several years ago Peter Berger wrote about marginalization and increasing irrelevance of sociology pointing to the two factors contributing to its demise: domination of quantitative methodology and ideologization. In his view the latter is reflected in the often unproductive repetition of the mantra of „class, race, and gender“. In my paper I ask whether these charges are somehow justified and discuss them in the wider context of recent debates over the condition of social sciences and the humanities. I ask also what is the condition of Polish sociology, and why it is so that Berger’s charges are only partially valid in the Polish context.

References

  1. Bauman, Z. 2009. Sztuka życia. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
  2. Berger, P.L. 1969. A Rumor of Angels. New York: Doubleday.
  3. Berger, P.L. 1992. Sociology: A Disinvitation? „Society” 30(1): 12–18.
  4. Berman, P. (red.). 1992. Debating P.C.: The Controversy Over Political Correctness on College Campuses. New York: Dell Publishing.
  5. Bloom, A. 2007. Umysł zamknięty. O tym jak amerykańskie szkolnictwo wyższe zawiodło demokrację i zubożyło dusze dzisiejszych studentów. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka.
  6. Bukraba-Rylska, I. 2004. Socjolog czasu transformacji – portret z negatywu. W: Marody, M. (red.). Zmiana czy stagnacja? Warszawa: SCHOLAR, s. 153–174.
  7. Burawoy, M. 2005. For Public Sociology. „American Sociological Review” 70(1): 429.
  8. Burawoy, M. 2009. The Public Sociology Wars. W: Jeffries, V. (red.). Handbook of Public Sociology. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, s. 449–473.
  9. Cole, S. 1994. Introduction: What’s Wrong with Sociology?. „Sociological Forum” 9(2): 129–131.
  10. Collins, R. 1994. Why the Social Sciences Won’t Become High-Consensus, Rapid- Discovery Science. „Sociological Forum” 9(2): 155-177. Debata socjologiczna na 50-lecie IFiS PAN. „Studia Socjologiczne” 184(1).
  11. Deflem, M. 2004. There’s the ASA, But Where’s the Sociology? „Footnotes. ASA Newsletter” 32(6): 9.
  12. Gliński, P. 2007. Socjologia polska i Polskie Towarzystwo Socjologiczne w roku 2007. „Studia Socjologiczne” 187(4): 11–29.
  13. Kimball, R. 1998. Tenured Radicals: How Politics Has Corrupted Our Higher Education. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.
  14. Lipset, M.S. 1994. The State of American Sociology. „Sociological Forum” 9(2): 199–220.
  15. Szacki, J. 1977. Czy kryzys socjologii? W: Tenże (red.). Czy kryzys socjologii? Warszawa: Czytelnik, s. 535.
  16. Tittle, Ch. 2004. The arrogance of public sociology. „Social Forces” 82: 1639–1643.
  17. Weber, M. 1998. Nauka jako zawód i powołanie. Kraków–Warszawa: Znak i Fundacja Stefana Batorego.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)